<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doesn&#8217;t Use Pagerank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/</link>
	<description>internet - Technology, Online News, Games and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NaijaEcash</title>
		<link>http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>NaijaEcash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Since Google has been inconsistent with the way they award pagerank to websites, one can&#039;t blame SponsoredReviews.com for ignoring pagerank in their blog evaluation. Personally, I feel that beside the use of the various ranking metrics, advertisers need to review a site manually to determine if it is what they want to spend money on. Just my personal opinion anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Google has been inconsistent with the way they award pagerank to websites, one can&#8217;t blame SponsoredReviews.com for ignoring pagerank in their blog evaluation. Personally, I feel that beside the use of the various ranking metrics, advertisers need to review a site manually to determine if it is what they want to spend money on. Just my personal opinion anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sk-rt.com</title>
		<link>http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>sk-rt.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Doesn’t Use Pagerank...&lt;/strong&gt;

This is what I’ve noticed with SponsoredReviews.com when I submitted a blog. They could be using pagerank in their evaluation of blogs behind the scenes but on the front end they clearly didn’t indicate it so I’ll safely assume that they are not ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Doesn’t Use Pagerank&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This is what I’ve noticed with SponsoredReviews.com when I submitted a blog. They could be using pagerank in their evaluation of blogs behind the scenes but on the front end they clearly didn’t indicate it so I’ll safely assume that they are not &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-tong.com/2007/11/26/doesnt-use-pagerank/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Doesn’t Use Pagerank...&lt;/strong&gt;

This is what I’ve noticed with SponsoredReviews.com when I submitted a blog. They could be using pagerank in their evaluation of blogs behind the scenes but on the front end they clearly didn’t indicate it so I’ll safely assume that they are not ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Doesn’t Use Pagerank&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This is what I’ve noticed with SponsoredReviews.com when I submitted a blog. They could be using pagerank in their evaluation of blogs behind the scenes but on the front end they clearly didn’t indicate it so I’ll safely assume that they are not &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
